Pio XII, Maranhão, Brazil, 1982.
Lives and works in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Represented by Periscópio Arte Contemporânea.
PIPA Prize 2012, 2013, 2014, 2016 and 2018 nominee.
Marcone started his artistic experimentation in the late 1990’s and has since participated in several exhibitions throughout the country and abroad. His work involves several languages, such as painting, sculpture, video, objects, photographs and installations. His work is related to the memory of worn out materials (boats, body works, utensils impregnated with culturally constructed meanings. The artist develops a work methodology where the interest lies on the symbolic exchange of materials, appropriation and displacement, procedures developed by the artist which aim at giving new meaning to “popular culture” in the economic circuit of “contemporary art”.
Video produced by Matrioska Filmes exclusively for PIPA 2016:
“Horizonte de Ferro”, 2014. Duration: 9’38”.
Recent solo exhibitions: “Liquid Territories”, Instituto Tomie Ohtake, São Paulo, SP, Brazil 2014, “2º ato: Marcone Moreira”, Foundation Joaquim Nabuco, Recife, Brazil, 2014 and “Peso à Terra”, Galeria Blau Projects, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 2014. Recent group exhibitions: “Rotation run for art”, curated by Alfons Hug and co-curated by Paula Borghi, Palmas, TO, Brazil, 2016; “Singularidades/Anotações Rumos Artes Visuais 1998-2013, curated by Aracy Amaral, Paulo Miyada, and Regina Silveira, Paço Imperial, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; “Intervenções Urbanas”, curated by Isabel Sanson Portella, Museu da República, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil and “Ficções”, curated by Daniela Name, Caixa Cultural, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 2015.
Main Awards: 2011, Marcantonio Vilaça Award, CNI/Sesi; 2010, winner of the Marcantonio Vilaça Award/FUNARTE; 2009, Artistic Research and Experimentation Stipend, grantedby Instituto de Artes do Pará, Belém-PA; 2008, Award-winnerat the25thSalon of Bahia, Salvador, BA; 2007, Projéteis de Arte Contemporânea Award, Funarte-RJ,andaward-winner atthe Exhibitions Program ofSão Paulo Cultural Center-SP; 2005, Pampulha Stipend, Pampulha Art Museum.
“Marcone Moreira and the Paradoxes of Appropriation”
Laymert Garcia dos Santos, 2012
Though a young man, Marcone Moreira has a career consolidated throughout fifteen years. As a matter of fact, the Maranhão-born, Pará-based artist started in 1997, had his first solo exhibition in Belém in 2003, and, since then, has projected himself as one of the exponents of the new generation. Hence, it is already possible to identify the main lines in his career, and look at his work in retrospect to find affirmation and coherence in it.
After following Moreira’s work during one year for Prêmio CNI SESI Marcantonio Vilaça para as Artes Plásticas, visiting him twice in Marabá, having contact with other local artists, attesting to his insertion in the Amazon, discussing his assumptions, getting acquainted with him on the occasion of the exhibitions of the Prize in Porto Alegre and Ribeirão Preto, and observing the way he moves through the Brazilian visual arts circuit, I have become convinced that he is an artist at the same time singular and complex, whose creations are eminently contemporary to the exact extent that they generate paradoxes after paradoxes, intriguing the observer and capturing them in his creations.
Both his singularity and complexity were soon detected by the critics who wrote about his work on the occasion of different exhibitions. As an example, in his very first solo exhibition, entitled Tráfego Visual (Visual traffic), Jorge Eiró wrote on the small catalogue a rather concise, wise, and playful text, in which he pointed out, at high speed, “the smuggling of references,” “a certain gangster charm,” and the “misappropriations” by this bold Amazonian who absorbed the classical information, or “the heavy historical burden”— Duchamp, Malevich, Mondrian, the Brazilian constructivism (concrete and neoconcrete), and what he dubbed “the Brazilian pop.”¹ But all that was mixed with a unique affective material, which submitted the influences to the expressive force of whatever invaded the artist’s visual field, or what was at hand. And from such mixture the first paradox emerged, brought forth by the tension of the encounter/divergence with/from an aesthetic education of art history modulated by the materials, objects, signs, and language of the popular culture of the Amazon.
According to Moreira himself, the awakening of his aesthetic emotion or even his artistic calling is anchored in ceramics, in transforming clay as a means of expression. Through it, his father, a stern man of few words, communicated with his young son, making him toys. There was the matrix, the greater impulse for a future artist, which becomes clear in his emotional bond with his land, its people, and also with his environment and its problematization, in terms of belonging.
Moreira wanted to become an artist and started practicing drawing and painting. The first helped him organize his head, as he himself says, “to build his thoughts”; the second, to be able to exist, absorbed the “local color,” that is, the colors and hues that make up the rural and urban landscape of the Amazon — his keen sense for the Amazonian habitat is amazing, and for all kinds of aesthetic expression that are manifested in it, whether deliberately artistic or not. That is why the acute observation by film director Robert Bresson applies, when he said that “to have discernment” is to have “precision in perception.”² Therefore, the artist soon understood that he might either create the colors on his paintings or find them “ready,” “arranged” on all sorts of supports — boat wrecks, fragments of truck bodies, beer crates, iron sheets, canvas bags, etc. For me, Moreira is, above all, a painter. Not only because he started out as a painter, but also, and most importantly, because his sculptures, videos, and even his photographs “approach painting in other ways.” In short, it was his painter’s discernment that led him to find the value of colors on what he calls the “tired matter.” Appropriating them was a logical step that did not take him long to put into practice, authorized by Duchamp.
As everybody knows, the French artist has become a recurrent, almost unavoidable reference in contemporary art, to the point that Paul B. Franklin protested, “The problem today is that everyone tries to be Duchamp. The proliferation of appropriation art, the rediscovery of the readymade — the thing that younger artists need to learn is how to be influenced by somebody without replicating their work.”³ Now, in Moreira’s case, it is easy to see how much the artist distances himself from this commonplace, although he does claim the inheritance. One just has to examine the richness and originality of his way of learning the Duchampian lesson and exercising appropriation.
Maybe one can affirm with some certainty that the founding logic of the artist’s work consists in operating, through emotion, three types of appropriation: of color, of matter, and of memory. Critic Lontra Costa, in his text “Metamorfose ambulante” (Walking metamorphosis, 2011), points out the color appropriation, also suggesting that it happens in the fashion of the founding experiences of Hélio Oiticica, who founded, in one single body, the constructive experimentation with the formal and chromatic solutions taken from popular art.4 In their turn, the matter and memory appropriations were already indicated by Marisa Mokarzel in her text “Arqueologia visual” (Visual archaeology, 2004). For her, Moreira behaves first as a collector or an archaeologist: “Matter is the beginning… it is the substance that will be submitted to the gaze of the one who selects and makes each piece available to integrate it in the process of decomposing, gathering, organizing, and reorganizing until it comes close to the founding idea of the object and fulfills the desire of whomever takes on a different role, this time, that of the architect, or maybe the builder or the designer.”5
Therefore, in Moreira, the appropriation consists in a double work: first, there is the archaeologist of the present and the collector who takes on the job of discerning, selecting, and displacing the “material”; then, there is the builder, architect, or designer who has the task of reconstructing it, or rather, of reconfiguring it. Hence, there is the “Duchamp moment,” followed by the “Oiticica moment.” The work resulting from both acquires consistency precisely in the articulation and the concretion of those two moments. Something that Moreira expresses in the following words: “I think that, as an artist, my question is to re-elaborate my world from how I perceive it, and that is what I dedicate myself to, from the place where I am currently living.… [T]he material that is collected in Marabá, which oftentimes has its own characteristics, goes through a filter that is myself, and I am always moving around, perceiving this place from inside and out.”6
It is interesting to note that the appropriation of Amazonian materials happens through the conceptual appropriation of the art of Duchamp and Oiticica. As if one appropriation validated the other, to be complete in it, as if the “tired matter” and the conceptual apparatus needed to merge through the creative gesture, so that both could acquire their full sense on the work’s amalgam. On an excellent text in 2005, Moacir dos Anjos accurately observed that Moreira’s work does not opt to be either painting or object7; therefore, it does not favor the “Duchamp moment” or the “Oiticica moment.” As a matter of fact, I believe the very strength of the works lies precisely in this non-option, this calculated indecisiveness that, just like in Herman Melville’s short story Bartleby, the Scrivener, “would prefer not to.” Neither a painting nor an object, but both at the same time, the works by the Amazonian artist may preserve their presence intact, just like they manifested themselves in their original Amazonian world; only now they are updated in the color, the matter, and the memory of a new work that is exhibited in the visual arts world. Thus, opting for not having to opt, Moreira’s work is inscribed in the category of paradox-objects that Boris Groys talks about when referring to Duchamp’s readymades.
In a very interesting book, Art Power, the German critic evokes Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain and Kazimir Malevich’s Black Square as paradox-objects that simultaneously embody thesis and antithesis, work and nonwork. For him, there is only one correct interpretation these objects impose on viewers: the works demand a self-contradictory reaction that is perfectly paradoxical: “The only adequate interpretation of a paradox is a paradoxical interpretation. Thus the deeper difficulty in dealing with modern art consists in our unwillingness to accept paradoxical, self-contradictory interpretations as adequate and true. But the unwillingness should be overcome — so that we can see modern and contemporary art for what it is, namely, a site of revelation of the paradox governing the balance of power. In fact, to be a paradox-object is the normative requirement implicitly applied to any contemporary artwork.”8
Evoking Søren Kierkegaard, for whom the new is a difference without difference, that is, a difference beyond difference, a difference that we are unable to recognize because it is not related to any pre-given structural code, Groys states that Duchamp’s readymades are effectively new because they are inscribed in this category. “…[T]oday, to be really new, an artwork cannot even repeat the old differences between art objects and ordinary things. By means of repeating these differences, it is possible only to create a different artwork, not a new artwork. The new artwork looks really new and alive only if it resembles, in a certain sense, every other ordinary, profane thing, or every other ordinary product of popular culture. Only in this case can the new artwork function as a signifier for the world outside the museum walls. The new can be experienced as such only if it produces an effect of out-of-bounds infinity — if it opens an infinite view on reality outside of the museum.”9
Boris Groys’ reflection on the readymades is pertinent to approach Moreira’s work, although it does not exactly replicate Duchamp’s gesture, since the Amazonian operates a plastic intervention on the “material,” reconfiguring it, and not only dislocating it from the space of life to the space of the museum. A more demanding reader could object that, in Moreira’s case, we are not in face of a difference without difference, a difference beyond difference, because there has been some interference. However, I might argue that the artist’s works are indeed paradox-objects because, paradoxically, the visual intervention, the “Hélio Oiticica moment” only confirms them in their previous mode of existence, although taking them out of their insignificance as “tired matter.” As if Moreira’s gesture made us see, in the present, what they were in the past, when no one saw their beauty, strength, relevance!
There is also another aspect highlighted by Groys that connects Moreira’s works to Duchamp’s readymades. It is the question of selection. As the critic writes, “…[A]rt today is defined by an identity between creation and selection. At least since Duchamp it has been the case that selecting an artwork is the same as creating an artwork. That, of course, does not mean that all art since then has become readymade art. It does, however, mean that the creative act has become the act of selection: since that time producing an object is no longer sufficient for its producer to be considered an artist. One must also select the object one has made oneself and declare it an artwork. Accordingly, since Duchamp there has no longer been any difference between an object one produces oneself and one produced by someone else — both have to be selected in order to be considered artworks. Today an author is someone who selects, who authorizes.”10
Let’s take, for instance, the works shown on the exhibitions of this Prize. Damas (Checkers) is an installation comprising twenty-two pieces — twenty-one checkers boards collected in bars and popular places in the south of Pará and a meat cutting board used by an anonymous housewife. In reality, Moreira did not make anything in this work, he “merely” selected; however, the mere displacement, accumulation, and disposition of the pieces turns the popular game into an aesthetic and artistic game, into a play with life and art that can be virtually expanded infinitely. Of course the Duchampian references are very present because of all the reasons mentioned above — even more so if we think about the refined irony to refer to the chess game that was so important in the work of the French artist! But then there comes the “Oiticica moment” that reconfigures the selected boards, adding, through the simple sum and juxtaposition, the question of composition, of colors, of the classical + popular equation. Culminating with the insinuation of a meat cutting board that dramatically opens the work to another dimension of everyday life, therefore, to a new paradoxical game between the leisure of the men and the house chores of the women in the Amazon… Margem (Border) follows an analogous principle. This is a vessel structure remounted in the exhibition venue. Here, color, matter and memory are condensed in the wood that is selected and reorganized. Once again, we must point out the relevance of selection followed by a keen sense of arrangement that updates the boat anchored on the riverside. Parede da memória (Memory wall) is an installation comprised of ninety-nine beer crates. Just like in the previous work, painting and sculpture unite to engrave and make present in a new image the trivial image that is part of life in Marabá — so many are the crates transported and stacked up, so much cold beer is drunk to quench the thirst in the tropical heat, so much inebriation erasing the contours of the hot colors and the shapes, drowning or reviving the memories of a fast-changing world… Thus, the pieces here assembled at the same time exist by themselves and affirm and reiterate the coherence in Moreira’s output. For how can one not see on the fourth work exhibited, Sem título (Untitled), a crowning of the whole set? As a matter of fact, it is a large 230 x 230 cm painted wood vessel frame. What do we see here but the embodiment of Moreira’s very aesthetical device? What is it to frame but to differentiate the act of fitting, selecting, appropriating, displacing, and installing it in the exhibiting room?
During the visits to the artist, this critic was able to see two other works that confirmed, each one in its own way, the intuitions and perceptions outlined here. Those are works in which creation seems to operate a kind of return to the matrices that have triggered the artistic activity, deepening it. They have to do with the land, that is, a sort of politicization and problematization of how one belongs to his or her habitat. Returning to his starting point, Moreira made, during a residency in Serra da Mantiqueira mountain range, in the state of Minas Gerais, a series of sculptures, casts of the feet of other artists and of locals, which were inserted in different contexts of the landscape and then photographed. Completing the series, the molds of the artist’s feet were cast. But here the action is of a different nature: Moreira deposits his clay molds into the clay and then comes from behind, stepping on his own feet, as if returning them to their condition of formless matter, giving them back to the earth where they came from. This time, instead of being photographed, the action is captured on video. Maybe because it is characterized as an action-moving image, and because it uses the body of the artist himself, the gestures reverberate over the photographic images, lending them new meanings by inscribing them in a perspective that has the creator as both the starting and the finishing points. It is the idea of the artist as a “filter,” as previously evoked. Besides, all differences considered, the action and the images resulting from it evoke Hélio Oiticica’s Counter-Bolide: To Return Earth to the Earth. Not that Moreira was inspired by this work. But the thing is, if, on the one hand, Oiticica conceives of such return operation from the object, Moreira sees it from the subject’s point of view.
Finally, within the same line of argument, there is a series of photographs entitled Homem rural (Rural man), in which the artist “enters” the previously made image, that is, he fictionalizes his insertion as a rural man in the romantic landscape of Almeida Júnior. It is deliberately fake. But its strength lies precisely in the fact that the artist’s biotype fits perfectly in the Brazilian rural landscape, creating a kind of paradox, because the fake is true, in a disturbing way. I should also mention that such procedure generates a man-environment relation that is diametrically opposed, for instance, to artist Ingrid Pollard’s, a black British citizen who photographs herself in the English countryside, calling the attention to the unfamiliarity of such act, for it goes against the clichés of what we understand as “being English.”
“Indications, traces, signs”
Moacir dos Anjos, 2005
Marcone Moreira’s works suggest, from the first contact with them, the crossing of different references. To some, what might draw more attention are the several plans the artist builds on different surfaces by placing side by side a reduced set of colors. To others, it is possible that the most interesting are the crude materials (almost always worn wood, sometimes also nylon, cardboard or iron) and the various shapes of the supports of these chromatic fields, weaving uncertainties about the nature of what is presented stuck to the wall or laid on the floor. To the cultured observer, it might also seem that there is, in the geometric composition of the forms painted, an affiliation to Brazilian constructivist tradition, which still echoes, in many ways, in a significant part of the country’s contemporary visual production. To those unfamiliar with the story of that art and ethics project, however, the works might correctly, although imprecisely, evoke traces of vernacular patterns used in the decoration of vehicles, toys and façades of houses.
The making of Marcone Moreira’s works also poses doubts about their origin to those who approach them. Although the painted forms could, theoretically, have all been created by the artist, the careful examination of their surfaces exposes the signs (peeling paint, holes of nails and screws, traces of metalwork, familiar cut-offs) that, in fact, other hands were the ones that mounted and painted, some variable and uncertain time ago, what he shows as his works. Rather than painting, therefore, it is the procedure of appropriation and juxtaposition of objects or parts of them (even if coming from a look filled with interest about what is painted or dyed on them) that guides his creative practice. Permeating his entire production, there are few works in which this constructive operation becomes as evident as in those where he makes use of colored pieces of nylon, generally used as the backs and seats of chairs or to make bags.
By transforming these remains (of doors, boxes, truck body shells, boats, roofs, furniture and other objects) into new things, Marcone Moreira furthermore affirms the double importance that the place where he lives – the city of Marabá (Pará), far north in the country – has to his production. On the one hand, this place of intensive movement of people and cargo (it is the intersection of two rivers, the Transamazonica Highway and the Carajás Railway) is where most of the material comes from – discarded things that no longer have their original function, which the artist selects, sections, groups and resignifies as his own. On the other hand, for being the confluence of different routes and symbolic references irreducible to any other ones, Marabá’s urban dynamics might be taken as a metaphor of the constructive procedures he uses. In the city, as well as in his work, there is no space for accurate definitions of belonging or identity, requiring from its inhabitants (including him) constant translations of senses, necessarily doomed to opacity and, therefore, to an always inconclusive and temporary result.
The difficulty in classifying Marcone Moreira’s works into stable categories is reflected on the ambiguous dialog they establish with the production of two other Brazilian contemporary artists. At first glance, the wood cut-offs he exhibits relate to the works of Minas artist Celso Renato, who also appropriated, back in the 1960’s, wooden boards, construction debris or pieces of doors found in the street to – as opposed to Marcone Moreira, who just chooses and transports them to another place – make on them paintings of constructivist extraction, adding, through pigment, one more layer of meaning.
It is yet inevitable to approach his works to the paintings of Emmanuel Nassar, also a Pará artist that shares with Marcone Moreira the interest for the same impure visual repertoire of the region where they live. The artists differ, however, in a basic constructive procedure: whereas Emmanuel Nassar appropriates, most of the times, only the images found, remaking them on various supports (sometimes entirely, other times changing them), Marcone Moreira additionally appropriates the physical support (wood, nylon or anything else) of the images – previously dispersed anywhere – that attract him.
Before a set of his works, therefore, little can be said in a definite way. This imprecision does not result, however, from conceptual deficiencies or from constructive indecisions; on the contrary, it emerges from them, constituting their integrity: without choosing between painting or object and moving between scholarly and popular references, he appropriates what is already in the world without claiming, therefore, exclusive authorship of what results from his gesture. He ultimately brings to a precise time and place (the moment of each exhibition and the place of the field of art), indications of a time not known for sure and places that are just for passing by.
-Paço das Artes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
-“Liquid Territories”, Instituto Tomie Ohtake, São Paulo, Brazil
-“2º ato: Marcone Moreira”, Foundation Joaquim Nabuco, Recife, Brazil
-“Peso à Terra”, Galeria Blau Projects, São Paulo, Brazil
-“Visualidade Ambulante”, Funarte/ MG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
-“Visualidade Ambulante”, Galeria Baró, São Paulo, Brazil
-“Superfícies”, Galeria Lurixs, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
-“Banzeiro”, Centro Universitário Maria Antonia, São Paulo, Brazil
-“Arqueologia Visual”, Centro Cultural Banco da Amazônia, Belém, Brazil
-“Marcone Moreira”, Centro Cultural São Paulo, Brazil
-“Margem”, Galeria Lurixs, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
-“Vestígios”, Museu de Arte da Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
-“Indícios”, Galeria Lurixs, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
-“Vestígios”, Galeria Virgilio, São Paulo, Brazil
-“Tráfego Visual”, Galeria Graça Landeira, Belém, Brazil
-“Rotation run for art”, curated by Alfons Hug and co-curated by Paula Borghi, Palmas, Brazil
-“Singularidades/Anotações Rumos Artes Visuais 1998-2013, curated by Aracy Amaral, Paulo Miyada, and Regina Silveira, Paço Imperial, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
-“Intervenções Urbanas”, curated by Isabel Sanson Portella, Museu da República, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
-“Ficções”, curated by Daniela Name, Caixa Cultural, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
-“A casa dos pais”, curated by Raphael Fonseca, Casa Contemporânea, São Paulo, Brazil
-“Das Viagens”, dos Desejos, dos Caminhos, curated by Bitú Cassundé, Museu Vale, Vila Velha, Brazil
-“Pororoca – A Amazônia no MAR”, curated by Paulo Herkenhoff, Museu de Arte do Rio (MAR-RJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
-“Rumos Legado”, Projeto Rumos, Itaú Cultural, São Paulo and other cities, Brazil
-“Um olhar sobre a coleção”, Foundation Clóvis Salgado, Ipatinga, Brazil
-“I Bienal do Barro”, Caruaru, Brazil
-“Projeto Campo Bahia”, Santo André, Brazil
-“Mundos Cruzados: Arte e Imaginário Popular”, Museu de Arte Moderna do Rio de Janeiro (MAM-RJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
-“Onde o Rio acaba”, Ateliê 397, São Paulo, Brazil
-“Bienal Internacional de Curitiba, Brazil
-“Mundos Cruzados”, MAM-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
-“From the Margin To the Edge”, Somerset House, London, curated by Rafael Cardoso
-“Amazon Cycles of Modernity”, CCBB, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, curated by Paulo Herkenhoff
-“The First 10 years”, Instituto Tomie Ohtake, São Paulo, Brazil curated by Agnaldo Farias
-“Amazon Art”, Museu Vale, Espírito Santo, Brazil
-“Nova Arte Nova”, CCBB, São Paulo, Brazil curated by Paulo Venâncio Filho
-“Nova Arte Nova”, CCBB, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil curated by Paulo Venâncio Filho
-ARCO ContemporaryArt Fair, Madrid, Spain
-“The Tropics”, Centro Cultural Banco do Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil and Museum Martin-Gropius-Bau, Berlin, Germany, curated by AlfonsusHug.
-PINTA Art Fair – The Modern & Contemporary Latin American Art, New York, USA
-“Traces”, Museum Art of Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
-“Paradoxos Brazil/ Rumos Visuais”, Itaú Cultural, São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Goiás, Brazil curated by Aracy Amaral
-“Panorama of Brazilian Art”, MARCO, Vigo, Spain, curated by Gerardo Mosquera
-“Panorama of Brazilian Art”, curated by Gerardo Mosquera
-“Faxinal das Artes”, Residency Program, Paraná, Brazil
Awards, Fellowships and Residencies
-Ficções Rurais: Construção e Pintura, artistic residency and workshop at NACO – Núcleo de Arte do Centro-Oeste Olhos D’Água, Alexânia, Brazil
2013 – 2014
-Artistic residency granted by Foundation Joaquim Nabuco in partnership with Centro Cultural do Banco do Nordeste (CCBNB), Recife, Brazil
-Production scholarship in Visual Arts, Funarte, Marabá, Brazil
-Marcantonio Vilaça award, CNI/SESI, Brazil
-Marcantonio Vilaça award, FUNARTE, Brazil
-Scholarship Research and Artistic Experimentation issued by the Institute of Arts of Pará, Belém, Brazil
-XV Salão da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
-Award Projectiles for Contemporary Art, Funarte, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
-Exhibition Program of Centro Cultural, São Paulo, Brazil
-Fellowship Pampulha, Museu Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Grand Prize at the Art Salon XXII of Pará , Belém, Brazil
-X Salão da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
-Faxinal of Arts, residency, Paraná, Brazil
Marcone Moreira, Contemporary Art – Series of videos produced with the winning artists of the Marcantonio Vilaça CNI/SESI award, 2011. Duration: 6’52”
In Conversation with Marcone Moreira – Arte Atual, Institute Tomie Ohtake, 2015. Duration: 6’52”.
- Meet the 78 nominees of PIPA Prize 2018
- PIPA Prize 2018 Nominees | 11th Bulletin
- "Cidade Jacaranda Pequenos Formatos: Dimensão e Escala" presents an impressive panorama of Brazilian visual arts
- Interview with Pipa 2016 Nominated Artists | Meet Adriana Vignoli, Ingrid Bittar and Marcone Moreira
- Interview with PIPA 2016 Nominated Artists | Meet Marcone Moreira
- PIPA 2016 Nominees | 9th Bulletin
- Last days | Exhibition "Ficções" dives into contemporary artistic narratives
- On view | "Ficções" explores narratives behind contemporary Brazilian artworks
- Exhibition "Ficções" looks into Brazilian art diversity through its narratives
- Group show "Of Journeys, Of Desires, Of Paths" closing soon